Socioeconomic Inequality: The Mediating Role of Learning Motivation in Academic Achievement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijetr.v4i2.2Keywords:
Socioeconomic, Mediating, Learning, Motivation, AchievementAbstract
This study re-examines the role of socioeconomic inequality in shaping academic achievement by introducing learning motivation as a key mediating mechanism. While socioeconomic status has long been recognized as a major determinant of educational outcomes, existing research often assumes a direct and deterministic relationship, overlooking the internal processes through which external conditions influence learning.
This study addresses this gap by proposing an integrative model that links socioeconomic inequality, learning motivation, and academic achievement in higher education.
Using a quantitative approach, this study employs a cross-sectional survey design involving undergraduate students. Data are collected through structured questionnaires and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to examine both direct and indirect relationships among variables. Socioeconomic inequality is operationalized through indicators such as access to resources, financial stability, and educational background, while learning motivation is conceptualized as a multidimensional construct encompassing intrinsic motivation, persistence, and engagement. The findings indicate that the direct effect of socioeconomic inequality on academic achievement is limited, while its indirect effect through learning motivation is substantial. Learning motivation emerges as a central mechanism that transforms structural conditions into academic outcomes, suggesting that students’ internal engagement plays a more decisive role than external resources alone. This study contributes to the literature by challenging deterministic views of educational inequality and advancing a mediated and process-oriented understanding of academic achievement. The findings highlight the need for educational policies that move beyond resource provision toward fostering student motivation as a key driver of learning.
References
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage Publications.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2022). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 77, 101548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101548
King, R. B., Wang, F., Leung, S., & Elliot, A. J. (2024). Socio-economic status, mastery-approach goals and learning-related outcomes: Mediation and moderation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12672
Michael, D., & Kyriakides, L. (2023). Mediating effects of motivation and socioeconomic status on reading achievement: A secondary analysis of PISA 2018. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 11(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00171-5
Rodríguez-Hernández, C. F., Cascallar, E., & Kyndt, E. (2020). Socio-economic status and academic performance in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 29, 100305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100305
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Sakız, H., Özdaş, F., Göksu, İ., & Ekinci, A. (2021). A longitudinal analysis of academic achievement and its correlates in higher education. SAGE Open, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211021413
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of market research (pp. 587–632). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2022). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Tan, C. Y. (2024). Socioeconomic status and student learning: Insights from an umbrella review. Educational Psychology Review, 36(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09924-7
Vázquez, A., Alba, B., Lois, D., García-Ael, C., & Bustillos, A. (2024). The role of subjective socioeconomic status in predicting academic performance: Exploring the mediating influence of sense of belonging among students in a distance learning university. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 27, E18. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2024.17
Vonková, H., Papajoanu, O., Hrabák, J., & Smith, M. L. (2024). Socioeconomic disparities and educational outcomes: Evidence from contemporary higher education systems. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 81, 101365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101365
Zhao, D., Liu, S., & Li, Q. (2022). Effects of socioeconomic status and its components on academic achievement: Evidence from Beijing–Shanghai–Jiangsu–Zhejiang (China). Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43(4), 968–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2022.2034118
